
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>apportionment/split</title>
<link>https://maao.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1796601</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:58:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 13:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2024 Massachusetts Association of Assessing Officers</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://maao.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1796601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>apportionment/split</title>
<link>https://maao.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1796601</link>
<guid>https://maao.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1796601</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Good morning,

History: A building was permitted as new construction in 2023 for a 104. Upon receiving the CO it was sold as condos. The office did not receive the deed for the sale of the first unit in 2023.  When the second unit was sold, early 2024, the folks here did a full transfer not realizing it was now a condo. I first became aware of the matter  after the preliminary bills went out but during a software conversion.   I now have access to the software and can address this. 


Issue:  I have been advised that to correct the matter, I need to do an apportionment of the preliminary billing and then do a spilt. I have also been told the matter will clear itself by only doing a split for the actual billing. Which is it or do both work at this point?
This is new for me. Any advice, reading, resources would be greatly appreciated. 

Thank you. Kelli]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 14:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
